Series 107 2006 ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
Section 107-691; Ord. 19288; Amending Chapter 16 of the City Code to add a new article on chronic nuisance property
Bill No. B 442-06 A
amending Chapter 16 of the City Code to add a new article on chronic nuisance property;
fixing the time when this ordinance shall become effective.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA, MISSOURI, AS
SECTION 1. A new Article IV of Chapter 16 of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of
Columbia, Missouri, is hereby enacted as follows:
ARTICLE IV. NUISANCES
DIVISION II. CHRONIC NUISANCE PROPERTY
Sec. 16-316. Legislative findings.
The city council makes the following legislative findings:
(1) Chronic unlawful activity on property
adversely affects the peace and safety of
neighboring residents and diminishes the quality of life in the neighborhood.
(2) Prosecution of unlawful activity
on property is not always an effective way to preserve a
desirable quality of life in the neighborhood.
(3) It is in the public interest for
property owners to be vigilant in preventing unlawful
activity from occurring on their property.
(4) It is in the public interest to
make property owners responsible for the use of their
property by tenants, occupants and visitors.
(5) The purpose of this article is
to maintain a desirable quality of life in Columbia by
holding property owners responsible for the use of their property.
Sec. 16-317. Definitions and rules of construction.
The following definitions and rules of construction apply
to this article:
Chief of police and chief include
any designee of the chief of police.
Chronic nuisance property means residential property
on which or within 200 feet of which
any person associated with the property has engaged in three or more nuisance activities during
any four (4) month period.
Nuisance activity means any of the following
(1) Harassment under section 565.090
RSMo or section 16-143 of this Code;
(2) Assault under section 565.050
RSMo through section 565.070 RSMo or section 16-141
of this Code;
(3) Any sexual offense under Chapter
(4) Any prostitution related offense
under Chapter 567 RSMo;
(5) Any violation of the liquor control
law, Chapter 311 RSMo or the alcoholic beverages
ordinance, chapter 4 of this Code;
(6) Trespass under section 569.140
RSMo or section 16-156 of this Code;
(7) Any stealing or related offense
under Chapter 570 RSMo or section 16-171 of this Code;
(8) Any arson or related offense under
section 569.040 through 569.065 RSMo or section
16-151 or 16-152 of this Code;
(9) Any violation of the Comprehensive
Drug Control Act of 1989" in chapter 195 RSMo
or sections 16-253 through 16-255 of this Code;
(10) Gambling under Chapter 572 RSMo;
(11) Discharge of a firearm under
section 16-234 of this Code;
(12) Possession of an open container
of alcoholic beverage under section 16-185 of this
(13) Indecent exposure under section
16-132 of this Code;
(14) Peace disturbance by fighting
under section 16-176.1 of this Code;
(15) Unlawful use of weapons and armed
criminal action under Chapter 571 RSMo and
brandishing a weapon under section 16-246 of this Code;
(16) Any noise violation under section
16-258 or section 16-259 of this Code;
Person associated with the property means any
person who is lawfully present on the
property including any owner, tenant, occupant, guest or invitee.
Property means any lot or other unit of real
Property owner means a person having a fee interest
in real property.
Property owner s agent means a person authorized
by the property owner to manage the
Residential property means any property containing
a single family structure, a duplex, an
apartment building, a manufactured or mobile home, a boarding house, a group home, a fraternity
or sorority house, or a mixed use structure that includes a residential living unit.
Sec. 16-318. Police chief determination of chronic nuisance property.
(a) Before any property is determined
to be a chronic nuisance property, the chief of police
must notify the property owner in writing that at least two nuisance activities have occurred on or
within two hundred (200) feet of the property and that the property is in danger of becoming a
chronic nuisance property. The notice shall identify the property and describe the alleged
nuisance activities in detail including the dates on which the alleged nuisance activities occurred.
The notice shall instruct the property owner to respond to the notice by either disputing
allegations of nuisance activities or proposing a plan to abate the nuisance activities. The notice
shall be served on the property owner by first class and certified mail or by personal service in
the same manner as legal process is served under any Missouri statute or court rule.
(b) The chief of police shall meet
with any property owner who requests a meeting to dispute
an allegation of nuisance activity or to discuss a plan to abate the nuisance activities. The
property owner shall be notified of the position of the chief of police on all disputed allegations
of nuisance activity within thirty (30) days after the meeting.
(c) If, after a property owner has
received notice under subsection (a), the chief of police
determines that an additional nuisance activity has occurred on or within two hundred (200) feet
of the property causing the property to become a chronic nuisance property, the chief of police
shall give the property owner written notice of the determination. The notice shall identify the
property and describe in detail the alleged nuisance activities that cause a property to be a
chronic nuisance property. The notice shall be served on the property owner by first class and
certified mail or by personal service in the same manner as legal process is served under any
Missouri statute or court rule. A notice mailed by first class mail shall be presumed
received three (3) days after it is mailed. The property owner shall have ten (10) days after
receipt of the notice to arrange a meeting with the chief of police to dispute the determination of
chronic nuisance property or persuade the chief of police to defer submitting the matter to the
city manager for abatement or to the city prosecutor for prosecution.
(d) The chief of police shall meet
with any property owner who requests a meeting to dispute
or discuss the determination of chronic nuisance property.
(e) If, after the property owner has
been given the opportunity to meet with the chief of
police, the chief still believes that the property is a chronic nuisance property, the chief may
submit a report on the matter to the city manager for abatement under section 16-319 or to the
city prosecutor for prosecution under section 16-321. The chief of police may defer referring
chronic nuisance property to the city manager or the prosecutor if the property owner has
presented an abatement plan satisfactory to the chief of police and has made good faith efforts to
implement the plan.
(f) Copies of the notices required
under subsections (a) and (c) shall be sent to any active
neighborhood association and any active neighborhood watch group for the neighborhood or
watch area in which the property is located.
(g) The provisions of this section
pertaining to property owners apply equally to property
Sec. 16-319. Administrative process for abating chronic nuisance property.
(a) If, after reviewing the police
chief s chronic nuisance property report, the city manager
determines that the proper procedures have been followed and that there is reason to believe that
the property may be a chronic nuisance property, the city manager may authorize the city
counselor to initiate an administrative action to abate the nuisance. The administrative action
shall follow the contested case provisions of Chapter 536, RSMo. The owners of the property
and any tenants shall be necessary parties to the action. The city manager or the manager
designee shall serve as hearing officer.
(b) If, after considering all evidence,
the hearing officer determines that the property is a
chronic nuisance property and that the procedures of section 16-318 were followed, the hearing
officer may order appropriate abatement. Abatement may include closure of the property for up
to one (1) year, physically securing the property, suspension of utility services during the period
of closure and revocation of a certificate of compliance for rental property. If there is more
one (1) residential unit on the property, the hearing officer shall close only the unit or units
whose occupants, guests or invitees have engaged in the nuisance activities. The hearing officer
shall consider the following factors in determining whether to close a chronic nuisance property:
(1) The level of cooperation of the
property owner and occupants in attempting to prevent
(2) The nature and extent of the nuisance
(3) The impact of the nuisance activities
on neighbors and others; and
(4) Any actions taken to avoid further
nuisance activities connected with the property.
(c) If an abatement order is not complied
with, the hearing officer may authorize the
abatement of the chronic nuisance property by city employees or by persons under contract with
the city. No person shall enter private property to enforce an abatement order unless the person
in possession of the property has consented to the entry or unless the municipal judge has issued
a warrant for the entry. The chief of police shall certify the cost of abatement under this
subsection to the city clerk. The cost shall include administrative costs as well as the actual
of abating the nuisance. The city clerk shall cause a special tax bill against the property to
prepared in the amount of the abatement cost. The tax bill from the date of its issuance shall
lien on the property until paid and shall be prima facie evidence of the recitals therein and of its
validity. No clerical error or informality in the tax bill or in the proceedings leading up to
issuance of the tax bill shall be a defense in an action to collect the tax bill. Tax bills issued
under this section, if not paid when due, shall bear interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per
year. The cost of abatement shall also constitute a personal obligation of any person who failed
to comply with the order of the hearing officer.
Sec. 16-320. Effect of property conveyance.
(a) When title to property is conveyed,
any nuisance activity that occurred before the
conveyance may not be used to establish the property as a chronic nuisance property unless the
reason for the conveyance was to avoid a determination that the property was a chronic nuisance
(b) There is a rebuttable presumption
that a reason for the conveyance of property was to
avoid a determination that the property was a chronic nuisance property if:
(1) The property was conveyed for
less than fair market value;
(2) The property was conveyed to an
entity controlled by a person conveying the property;
(3) The property was conveyed to a
relative of a person conveying the property.
Sec. 16-321. Chronic nuisance property prohibited.
(a) It shall be unlawful for a property
owner or a property owner s agent to cause, permit or
allow the property to become a chronic nuisance property.
(b) The procedures set forth in section
16-318 must be followed before any property owner
or property owner s agent is prosecuted for a violation of this section. No person shall
prosecuted under this section and made a party to an administrative action under section 16-319
based on the same facts.
Sec. 16-322. Other unlawful acts.
It shall be unlawful for any person to:
(1) Fail to obey an abatement order
issued under this article;
(2) Interfere with any police officer,
agent or employee of the city who is enforcing an
abatement order issued under this article; or
(3) Occupy or use or allow another
to occupy or use property that has been closed by an
abatement order issued under this article.
Sec. 16-323. Defenses.
(a) In any prosecution or abatement
action under this article, it shall be an affirmative
defense that the property owner has evicted or is diligently attempting to evict all tenants and
occupants of the property that committed each alleged nuisance activity that caused the property
to become a chronic nuisance property.
(b) In any prosecution or abatement
action under this article, it shall be an affirmative
defense that the property owner has diligently pursued reasonable means to avoid a recurrence of
violations similar to the alleged nuisance activities that caused the property to become a chronic
Sec. 16-324. Penalty.
(a) Any person who violates section
16-321 shall, upon conviction, be punished for a first
offense by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) nor more than two thousand
dollars ($2,000.00) or by imprisonment not exceeding three (3) months or by both such fine and
imprisonment. Upon conviction for a second or subsequent offense, a person shall be punished
by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) nor more than four thousand dollars
($4,000.00) or by imprisonment not exceeding three (3) months or by both such fine and
(b) Any person who violates section
16-322 shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of
not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by
imprisonment not exceeding three (3) months or by both such fine and imprisonment.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage.
PASSED this 6th day of November, 2006.